Evaluating K12 Web Sites

Name: NCTE Main Website

Date: October 10, 2006

Web Site URL: http://www.ncte.org/

Description: Briefly describe the web site. Is the site intended for students or teachers? What kind of information is presented?

This is the official website for the National Council of Teachers of English, a resource group for K-12 teachers in the Language Arts field.  It is aimed squarely at active and pre-service teachers.  They have information regarding curriculum planning ideas, classroom management techniques, current news related to teaching English, etc.

Appropriate Content: Are the materials worthwhile and valuable? How well does the web site cover the subject matter? What is the subject area and implied target audience? What types of things will the teacher gain or student learn from the site? Is the content, the language and instructional approach clear and at the appropriate level? What evidence is there that information is accurate and credible?

There is a wealth of useful information provided for free, and a lot more if you are willing to pay.  Book reviews and shopping let you know what you should be reading, daily tips to use in your classroom can keep you sharp and current, and all of the information is divided clearly into categories based on grade level and interests.  If you are a member, NCTE involvement will keep you current, and they are a well-known nationally recognized organization, so there is little question about the accuracy or credibility of the resources.

Design: Are appropriate design features employed by the web site? Is information easy to find, read and use? Can the user easily navigate from one part of the site to another? Would it be accessible to users with disabilities? `Give examples.

Honestly, the site could be more intuitively designed.  It incorporates some newer Web 2.0 features such as CSS formatting and de-cluttered menus, but it is visually busy in some areas and it can be a chore to find exactly what you’re looking for.  It isn’t very accessible, as most of the formatting breaks at larger text sizes (especially the menus) and some of the text has poor contrast, such as dark gray menu text on a light gray background.  Once a user gets a feel for the menus, it is possible to move around the site fairly quickly.

Accessibility: Would the web site allow a person with a disability to fully access it? For example, is information presented and organized in a way that can be used by persons with visual disabilities and devices they may use?

This was partially addressed in the last question.  I feel like it is not designed for accessibility.  The text menus use small fonts, and the button menus use a very narrow font on colored fields that would be very difficult for a person with poor eyesight to read.  Many of the clickable areas are quite small, so people with limited fine motor control may be frustrated as they navigate the site.  As mentioned, the formatting breaks when the text size is increased, and the navigation buttons are images so they don’t even increase.  This site would be best viewed using magnification software if a user has trouble reading.  A person with language disabilities would be stymied by the image buttons because a reader-program wouldn’t be able to read them.

Overall evaluation: What is your general impression of the site? Is the web free of broken links and images? Would another medium be better for the same information (e.g. would a book or video work better)? Is the web site effective? Summarize and give an honest recommendation regarding this site. Describe how it may be used in your classroom.

Despite some of the design issues, the website remains a highly functional and information-rich resource.  NCTE also publishes journals, newsletters, and magazines, and this site works well in conjunction with those other mediums to deliver useful information.  I would recommend to anyone teaching English that they at least look at this site carefully to see if they should join the organization.